feat(true/false): add benchmarks for startup performance

[naoNao89]

Add benchmarks for true/false commands to measure startup performance. Includes both function call and process spawn benchmarks.

Closes #10837

[oech3]

I think --help/--version in not needed since they are not frequently used.

[oech3]

while someone might use true any strings via dummy symlinks.

[naoNao89]

oke

├─ false_consecutive_calls    188.8 µs      │ 312.7 µs      │ 228.1 µs      │ 229.5 µs      │ 100     │ 100
├─ false_no_args              2.073 µs      │ 8.998 µs      │ 2.218 µs      │ 2.36 µs       │ 100     │ 200
├─ false_spawn_no_args        2.022 ms      │ 10.3 ms       │ 2.737 ms      │ 3.181 ms      │ 100     │ 100
├─ false_spawn_with_args      1.964 ms      │ 21.17 ms      │ 3.123 ms      │ 4.002 ms      │ 100     │ 100
├─ false_uu_app_construction  83.68 µs      │ 1.522 ms      │ 102 µs        │ 127.6 µs      │ 100     │ 100
╰─ false_with_args            2.171 µs      │ 20.25 µs      │ 2.582 µs      │ 2.886 µs      │ 100     │ 100

[oech3]

We want to sacrifice performance for cold uu_app() calls for hot pathes. So we don't want to bench them.
(In other words, bench for hot pathes are used to block accidentaly re-adding uu_app to hot pass by refactoring by someone)

[naoNao89]

oke, my changes satisfy that requirement

[sylvestre]

🆕 20 new benchmarks

I don't think we need 20 benchmarks for true & false
please make them 2 for each

[oech3]

#10996 (comment)

Should we keep uumain bench only (considering we can't do anything for Rust's runtime itself)?

[sylvestre]

yeah

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/misc/io-errors. tests/misc/io-errors is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 4.74%

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 293 untouched benchmarks
🆕 8 new benchmarks
⏩ 42 skipped benchmarks¹

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
🆕	Simulation	false_no_args	N/A	2.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	false_consecutive_calls	N/A	28.6 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	true_no_args	N/A	2.2 µs	N/A
🆕	Simulation	true_consecutive_calls	N/A	28.3 µs	N/A
🆕	Memory	true_no_args	N/A	33 B	N/A
🆕	Memory	true_consecutive_calls	N/A	33 B	N/A
🆕	Memory	false_no_args	N/A	33 B	N/A
🆕	Memory	false_consecutive_calls	N/A	33 B	N/A
⚡	Simulation	shuf_input_range[1000000]	89.7 ms	85.6 ms	+4.74%

---

_{Comparing naoNao89:feat/true-false-benchmarks (667f1ca) with main (a611f98)}

Footnotes

1. 42 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[oech3]

Is this OK to merge? Also I think RAM bench is not needed (not sure can we remove them or not...).

[oech3]

I think true and false have some useless signal handling coming from #[uucore::main], but I can't remove them soon.