[PERF ONLY] rustdoc stringdex update

[notriddle]

https://gitlab.com/notriddle/stringdex/-/merge_requests/25

[notriddle]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 032b906 (032b906243bfa5eb6e1ab0349b24b05a55caf840, parent: f5209000832c9d3bc29c91f4daef4ca9f28dc797)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (032b906): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.5%, -0.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.2%	[-0.2%, -0.2%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -4.3%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.8%	[2.8%, 2.8%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-4.3%	[-4.3%, -4.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.0%	[-3.0%, -3.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-4.3%	[-4.3%, -4.3%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -2.9%, secondary 4.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.6%	[4.6%, 4.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.9%	[-2.9%, -2.9%]	1

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 472.896s -> 474.902s (0.42%)
Artifact size: 389.04 MiB -> 389.06 MiB (0.01%)

[notriddle]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 628c1c5 (628c1c5dc337f167612cd6ef886b72a76d41a264, parent: 3391c0133661be933c3ef24edf1867d71b9f206b)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (628c1c5): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.5%	[-0.5%, -0.5%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.3%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.1%	[-3.1%, -1.1%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary -1.8%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.7%	[2.7%, 2.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.9%	[-4.6%, -1.9%]	4
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 473.663s -> 474.105s (0.09%)
Artifact size: 389.32 MiB -> 389.30 MiB (-0.00%)

[notriddle]

I like the CPU and doc_files_count results.

I’m less fond of doc_bytes, but that’s tiny, and it seems like an unavoidable side effect of bundling.

[yotamofek]

The doc_bytes regression is tiny, IMHO. I think the results look great!

[GuillaumeGomez]

That definitely seems positive, well done. :)

[notriddle]

@bors try

@rust-timer queue profiles=Doc

[notriddle]

@bors try cancel

[rust-bors]

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

• https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/20360132343

[notriddle]

@bors try

@rust-timer queue profiles=Doc

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: bda600c (bda600c00dc62866c672b727756a06bc4b19856d, parent: 526a91cbcc4601b92b0587405015e07b9c0d79f6)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (bda600c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.7%, -0.3%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.0%	[-1.0%, -1.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-0.7%, -0.3%]	2

Max RSS (memory usage)

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 481.711s -> 480.415s (-0.27%)
Artifact size: 390.58 MiB -> 390.60 MiB (0.01%)

[GuillaumeGomez]

Looks pretty good. Want to make other changes or is it ready to go?

[notriddle]

#150217