Skip to content

Conversation

@hdgarrood
Copy link
Collaborator

Like #148, except we keep the same set of dependencies.

Comment on lines +34 to +35
, "react"
, "react-dom"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this mainly for testing the shim stuff? Do we intend to have a process for adding additional libraries from the set. Or perhaps we should just blanket state we are not adding more libraries until we figure out a caching/purging solution for externs?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I originally added these a week or two ago for testing the shim stuff, yeah. I'd like to at least add back libraries which were previously provided by other backends (#142). After that, saying we are not going to add any more libraries until we figure out a caching/purging solution (at which point we can add the whole package set) works for me.

@hdgarrood hdgarrood merged commit 4341a0d into master Apr 12, 2020
@hdgarrood hdgarrood deleted the spago-server-package-set-2 branch April 12, 2020 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants