More traits for S220 S221 Right ray topologies on omega_1#1685
More traits for S220 S221 Right ray topologies on omega_1#1685GeoffreySangston merged 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
If you did this, I recommend you click "Approve". :) |
|
@prabau Hmm I accidentally did it out of order (hitting approve before your final change). I'll see how to fix it. |
|
If anyone has an idea about "injectively path connected", that would be great. Can be added later. |
GeoffreySangston
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re-do Approve.
That's irrelevant. It remains approved, unless you "request rereview" with a button at the top I think? |
|
@prabau Well clearly I'm botching this. My apologies. I don't think I ever did the "Enable auto-merge (squash)" steps now that I think about it. Maybe that's why I'm confused? |
|
??? @GeoffreySangston you have to click on the Approve button from the Files changed page ("Submit review"). |
I assure you I've done this. Edit: Well, maybe I submitted it from a different page. |
|
Now if you want to do "squash and merge", remember to blank out the detailed description before clicking. |
Does this work?: Let f:[0,1] -> X be an injective map. Note the image of f has to be unbounded because of cardinality. |
|
I think @felixpernegger's argument applies verbatim to the locally injectively path connected trait of S221 as well. |
|
Very nice. Another way, maybe easier, to rewrite the argument: f(E) is countable and thus bounded by say |
This adds most remaining decidable traits for S220 (Right "closed ray" topology on$\omega_1$ ) and S221 (Right "open ray" topology on $\omega_1$ ).
S221-P230 (locally simply connected): The justification is a general theorem [Hereditarily connected => Locally simply connected]. I did not add it as a new theorem because once we add the "locally contractible" property, we can have a stronger result with that.
The remaining traits I am not sure about are:
(obviously false if (CH) is false, but could be false in general)