Skip to content

chore: remove known providers table from README#246

Merged
josecolella merged 1 commit intomainfrom
remove-known-providers-table
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

chore: remove known providers table from README#246
josecolella merged 1 commit intomainfrom
remove-known-providers-table

Conversation

@josecolella
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

  • Removes the "Known Providers" table from the README since this information is already maintained on the OpenFeature ecosystem page
  • Keeps the link to the ecosystem page and all other provider documentation intact

Test plan

  • Verify README renders correctly on GitHub
  • Confirm the ecosystem page link still works

🤖 Jose's AI agent

The known providers table is maintained in the OpenFeature ecosystem
page and doesn't need to be duplicated here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jose Colella <jose.colella@gusto.com>
@josecolella josecolella requested a review from a team as a code owner March 9, 2026 21:51
@josecolella josecolella requested a review from beeme1mr March 9, 2026 21:51
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request streamlines the project's documentation by eliminating redundant information from the README.md file. The 'Known Providers' table has been removed, directing users to the comprehensive and up-to-date OpenFeature ecosystem page for provider listings, thereby centralizing this information and improving maintainability.

Highlights

  • Documentation Cleanup: Removed the 'Known Providers' table from the README.md file, as this information is now maintained on the OpenFeature ecosystem page.
  • Link Preservation: Ensured that the existing link to the OpenFeature ecosystem page and other provider documentation remains in the README.md.
Changelog
  • README.md
    • Removed the 'Known Providers' table.
Activity
  • Author provided a test plan to verify correct README rendering on GitHub and confirm the ecosystem page link functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@josecolella josecolella enabled auto-merge (squash) March 9, 2026 21:51
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request removes the 'Known Providers' table from the README.md file. This is a good change as it removes duplicated information and points to the OpenFeature ecosystem page as the single source of truth for available providers, reducing maintenance overhead. The change is correct and I have no further feedback.

Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.

@josecolella josecolella merged commit cfdf478 into main Mar 9, 2026
20 checks passed
@josecolella josecolella deleted the remove-known-providers-table branch March 9, 2026 21:53
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.50%. Comparing base (f9d5cfa) to head (6a902a1).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #246   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.50%   99.50%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines         808      808           
=======================================
  Hits          804      804           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants