Skip to content

refactor: add breakpoints signal based on tailwind (@fehmer) #7403

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
Miodec merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

refactor: add breakpoints signal based on tailwind (@fehmer) #7403

Miodec merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2026

Conversation

@fehmer
Copy link
Member

@fehmer fehmer commented Jan 21, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Replace useTailwindBreakpoints hook with a breakpoint signal.

  • Example bp().lg to detect a large screen
  • create media queries based on the css variables for breakpoints
  • use change event listeners on the media queries to update the signal, debounced
  • rename 2xl to xxl so it can be used without array access bp()["2xl"]

@monkeytypegeorge monkeytypegeorge added the frontend User interface or web stuff label Jan 21, 2026
@fehmer fehmer force-pushed the feature/solid-mediaqueries branch from a070abc to 4fa8fa9 Compare January 21, 2026 00:33
@fehmer fehmer marked this pull request as draft January 21, 2026 00:33
@fehmer fehmer marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2026 01:11
@github-actions github-actions bot added the waiting for review Pull requests that require a review before continuing label Jan 21, 2026
@Miodec Miodec merged commit 22d0282 into master Jan 21, 2026
23 checks passed
@Miodec Miodec deleted the feature/solid-mediaqueries branch January 21, 2026 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

frontend User interface or web stuff waiting for review Pull requests that require a review before continuing

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@fehmer @Miodec @monkeytypegeorge