Skip to content

Add technical terms to Vale vocabulary#4322

Open
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mintlify/vale-vocab-1773206127
Open

Add technical terms to Vale vocabulary#4322
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
mintlify/vale-vocab-1773206127

Conversation

@mintlify
Copy link
Contributor

@mintlify mintlify bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Summary

  • Added 7 technical terms to the Vale vocabulary from agent/workflows.mdx
  • Terms: diffs?, endpoints?, refactors?, sandbox, src, subdirector(y|ies)

Note

Low Risk
Only updates documentation linting vocabulary; no runtime code or behavior changes.

Overview
Updates Vale’s Mintlify accept.txt vocabulary to allow additional technical terms (e.g., diffs?, endpoints?, refactors?, sandbox, src, subdirector(y|ies)), reducing false-positive spelling/style errors in docs.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3d6223d. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

Generated-By: mintlify-agent
Copy link

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 3 potential issues.

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

elem
ELK
(?i)enum
endpoints?
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New entry endpoints? placed after enum breaks alphabetical order

Low Severity

endpoints? is placed after (?i)enum (line 200), but alphabetically "endpoint" (e-n-d…) sorts before "enum" (e-n-u…). The TERMS section is otherwise kept in roughly alphabetical order, so this entry belongs before the (?i)enum line.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

sitemaps?
SDKs
SEO
sandbox
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New entry sandbox placed far from correct alphabetical position

Low Severity

sandbox is placed after SEO (line 276), but alphabetically "sandbox" (s-a-n…) sorts well before scss (line 271), scrollbar, SDK, and SEO. It belongs near the beginning of the "s" entries in the TERMS section, before scss.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Strikethrough
struct
subgraphs?
subdirector(y|ies)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New entry subdirector(y|ies) placed after subgraphs? breaks order

Low Severity

subdirector(y|ies) is placed after subgraphs? (line 293), but alphabetically "subdirector" (s-u-b-d…) sorts before "subgraphs" (s-u-b-g…) since d < g. It belongs before the subgraphs? entry to maintain the alphabetical ordering convention used in the TERMS section.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants