Revert "Revert "Fixed an issue with contextual type for intersection …#50311
Revert "Revert "Fixed an issue with contextual type for intersection …#50311amcasey wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
Conversation
…properties (microsoft#48668)" (microsoft#50279)" This reverts commit adf26ff.
|
@typescript-bot user test this inline |
|
Heya @amcasey, I'm starting to run the diff-based user code test suite on this PR at b6bb411. Hold tight - I'll update this comment with the log link once the build has been queued. Update: The results are in! |
|
Is there any other extended test suite that we could run against this? Those |
|
@Andarist Sorry for the noise - I'm not actually investigating your change specifically - I'm just messing with the infrastructure and wanted to do some validation. But, yes, it's possible to run individual PRs against the NewErrors infrastructure. I'll give that a shot once I get some more basic things working. |
oh… that’s a bummer… for me 😜
that’s pretty cool! If u ever get to it - please ping me, i’d be interested in those results |
|
@amcasey Here are the results of running the top-repos suite comparing Something interesting changed - please have a look. Details
|
|
@Andarist the testing infrastructure is still in flux, but I think the bot comment I didn't delete shows the problem that necessitated the revert. |
|
@amcasey yes, the Redux types were the reason behind the revert - so this is expected. It's good to know though that "only" Redux was affected by this change. |
|
@Andarist Nope, no new information, but you sounded curious. 😄 The PR-specific tests only cover the top 100 GH repos (by star count) but the next 100 show many more breaks (though most/all related to their consumption of redux, as far as I know). Mostly, I'm pleased to know that we have a system in place now that could have caught the issue. |
…properties (#48668)" (#50279)"
This reverts commit adf26ff.
I'd like to see what the on-demand user tests report for this