Set correct counterparty_spendable_height on c.p. revoked HTLCs#3564
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits intolightningdevkit:mainfrom Jan 30, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
TheBlueMatt
commented
Jan 27, 2025
TheBlueMatt
commented
`counterparty_spendable_height` is not used outside of `package.rs` so there's not much reason to have an accessor for it. Also, in the next commit an issue with setting the correct value for revoked counterparty HTLC outputs is fixed, and the upgrade path causes the value to be 0 in some cases, making using the value in too many places somewhat fraught.
TheBlueMatt
force-pushed
the
2025-01-revoked-htlc-not-pinnable
branch
from
80fd088 to
215995c
Compare
Contributor
|
This basically LGTM. Willing to approve after the misleading comment on the functional tests is fixed. |
TheBlueMatt
force-pushed
the
2025-01-revoked-htlc-not-pinnable
branch
from
901fe7b to
b4f85e4
Compare
If the counterparty broadcasts a revoked transaction with offered HTLCs, the output is not immediately pinnable as the counterparty cannot claim the HTLC until the CLTV expires and they use an HTLC-Timeout path. Here we fix the `counterparty_spendable_height` value we set on counterparty revoked HTLC claims to match reality. Note that because we still consider these outputs `Pinnable` the value is not used. In the next commit we'll start making them `Unpinnable` which will actually change behavior. Note that when upgrading we have to wipe the `counterparty_spendable_height` value for non-offered HTLCs as otherwise we'd consider them `Unpinnable` when they are, in fact, `Pinnable`.
If the counterparty broadcasts a revoked transaction with offered HTLCs, the output is not immediately pinnable as the counterparty cannot claim the HTLC until the CLTV expires and they use an HTLC-Timeout path. Here we properly set these packages as `Unpinnable`, changing some transaction generation during tests.
Collaborator
Author
|
Squashed. |
TheBlueMatt
force-pushed
the
2025-01-revoked-htlc-not-pinnable
branch
from
b4f85e4 to
6c57a1f
Compare
wpaulino
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
morehouse
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2025
Collaborator
Author
|
Backported in #3613 |
TheBlueMatt
added a commit
to TheBlueMatt/rust-lightning
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 3, 2025
v0.1.2 - Apr 02, 2025 - "Foolishly Edgy Cases" API Updates =========== * `lightning-invoice` is now re-exported as `lightning::bolt11_invoice` (lightningdevkit#3671). Performance Improvements ======================== * `rapid-gossip-sync` graph parsing is substantially faster, resolving a regression in 0.1 (lightningdevkit#3581). * `NetworkGraph` loading is now substantially faster and does fewer allocations, resulting in a 20% further improvement in `rapid-gossip-sync` loading when initializing from scratch (lightningdevkit#3581). * `ChannelMonitor`s for closed channels are no longer always re-persisted immediately after startup, reducing on-startup I/O burden (lightningdevkit#3619). Bug Fixes ========= * BOLT 11 invoices longer than 1023 bytes long (and up to 7089 bytes) now properly parse (lightningdevkit#3665). * In some cases, when using synchronous persistence with higher latency than the latency to communicate with peers, when receiving an MPP payment with multiple parts received over the same channel, a channel could hang and not make progress, eventually leading to a force-closure due to timed-out HTLCs. This has now been fixed (lightningdevkit#3680). * Some rare cases with multi-hop BOLT 11 route hints or multiple redundant blinded paths could have led to the router creating invalid `Route`s were fixed (lightningdevkit#3586). * Corrected the decay logic in `ProbabilisticScorer`'s historical buckets model. Note that by default historical buckets are only decayed if no new datapoints have been added for a channel for two weeks (lightningdevkit#3562). * `{Channel,Onion}MessageHandler::peer_disconnected` will now be called if a different message handler refused connection by returning an `Err` from its `peer_connected` method (lightningdevkit#3580). * If the counterparty broadcasts a revoked state with pending HTLCs, those will now be claimed with other outputs which we consider to not be vulnerable to pinning attacks if they are not yet claimable by our counterparty, potentially reducing our exposure to pinning attacks (lightningdevkit#3564).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.