Use sign_holder_htlc_transaction to sign non-anchors holder HTLCs#2667
Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 6 commits intolightningdevkit:mainfrom Oct 20, 2023
Merged
Conversation
ariard
reviewed
Oct 17, 2023
ariard
reviewed
Oct 18, 2023
ariard
left a comment
ariard
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Re-broadcasting at every block still means every competing replacement must at least commit feerate in mempool
We plan to use `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` to also sign holder HTLC transactions on non-anchor outputs channels. `HTLCDescriptor` was only used in an anchor outputs context, so a few things needed changing, mostly to handle the different scripts and feerate.
`OnchainTxHandler` will need to construct `HTLCDescriptor`s for holder HTLCs, but it did not have access to all of the derivation parameters that need to be provided.
wpaulino
force-pushed
the
random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
branch
from
4f1d1f8 to
dc1c232
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention:
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2667 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.06% 88.72% -0.34%
==========================================
Files 112 112
Lines 87417 88365 +948
Branches 87417 88365 +948
==========================================
+ Hits 77856 78405 +549
- Misses 7322 7718 +396
- Partials 2239 2242 +3
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
TheBlueMatt
previously approved these changes
Oct 20, 2023
jkczyz
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
Contributor
|
Looks good after a couple minor comments. Much more mechanical than I first thought. |
|
won’t have time to review further, though test coverage sounds good from previous look. |
wpaulino
force-pushed
the
random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c171169 to
225a860
Compare
jkczyz
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
jkczyz
reviewed
Oct 20, 2023
wpaulino
force-pushed
the
random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
branch
from
225a860 to
a5fd95d
Compare
jkczyz
previously approved these changes
Oct 20, 2023
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels. We can easily do this by reusing the existing `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction` method and circumventing the existing `holder_htlc_sigs/prev_holder_htlc_sigs` caches, which will be removed in a later commit anyway.
Since we want our holder HTLC signatures to be randomly generated and not reused, our existing caches are useless now, so we opt to remove them.
`sign_holder_commitment_and_htlcs` never really made sense. Unlike `sign_counterparty_commitment`, the signatures for holder HTLC transactions may be required much later than the commitment transaction's. While it was nice for us to only reach the signer once to obtain all holder signatures, it's not really ideal anymore as we want our signatures to be random and not reused. We no longer return all holder HTLC signatures and instead defer to obtaining them via `EcdsaChannelSigner::sign_holder_htlc_transaction`.
Now that `HTLCDescriptor` is no longer specific to anchors, it doesn't make sense for it to live in the `bump_transaction` module anymore.
wpaulino
force-pushed
the
random-htlc-holder-sigs-non-anchors
branch
from
a5fd95d to
b06a652
Compare
jkczyz
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2023
TheBlueMatt
approved these changes
Oct 20, 2023
PXplod
pushed a commit
to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
0.0.118 - Oct 23, 2023 - "Just the Twelve Sinks" API Updates =========== * BOLT12 sending and receiving is now supported as an alpha feature. You may run into unexpected issues and will need to have a direct connection with the offer's blinded path introduction points as messages are not yet routed. We are seeking feedback from early testers (lightningdevkit#2578, lightningdevkit#2039). * `ConfirmationTarget` has been rewritten to provide information about the specific use LDK needs the feerate estimate for, rather than the generic low-, medium-, and high-priority estimates. This allows LDK users to more accurately target their feerate estimates (lightningdevkit#2660). For those wishing to retain their existing behavior, see the table below for conversion. * `ChainHash` is now used in place of `BlockHash` where it represents the genesis block (lightningdevkit#2662). * `lightning-invoice` payment utilities now take a `Deref` to `AChannelManager` (lightningdevkit#2652). * `peel_onion` is provided to statelessly decode an `OnionMessage` (lightningdevkit#2599). * `ToSocketAddrs` + `Display` are now impl'd for `SocketAddress` (lightningdevkit#2636, lightningdevkit#2670) * `Display` is now implemented for `OutPoint` (lightningdevkit#2649). * `Features::from_be_bytes` is now provided (lightningdevkit#2640). For those moving to the new `ConfirmationTarget`, the new variants in terms of the old mempool/low/medium/high priorities are as follows: * `OnChainSweep` = `HighPriority` * `MaxAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `max(25 * 250, HighPriority * 10)` * `MinAllowedAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `MempoolMinimum` * `MinAllowedNonAnchorChannelRemoteFee` = `Background - 250` * `AnchorChannelFee` = `Background` * `NonAnchorChannelFee` = `Normal` * `ChannelCloseMinimum` = `Background` Bug Fixes ========= * Calling `ChannelManager::close_channel[_with_feerate_and_script]` on a channel which did not exist would immediately hang holding several key `ChannelManager`-internal locks (lightningdevkit#2657). * Channel information updates received from a failing HTLC are no longer applied to our `NetworkGraph`. This prevents a node which we attempted to route a payment through from being able to learn the sender of the payment. In some rare cases, this may result in marginally reduced payment success rates (lightningdevkit#2666). * Anchor outputs are now properly considered when calculating the amount available to send in HTLCs. This can prevent force-closes in anchor channels when sending payments which overflow the available balance (lightningdevkit#2674). * A peer that sends an `update_fulfill_htlc` message for a forwarded HTLC, then reconnects prior to sending a `commitment_signed` (thus retransmitting their `update_fulfill_htlc`) may result in the channel stalling and being unable to make progress (lightningdevkit#2661). * In exceedingly rare circumstances, messages intended to be sent to a peer prior to reconnection can be sent after reconnection. This could result in undefined channel state and force-closes (lightningdevkit#2663). Backwards Compatibility ======================= * Creating a blinded path to receive a payment then downgrading to LDK prior to 0.0.117 may result in failure to receive the payment (lightningdevkit#2413). * Calling `ChannelManager::pay_for_offer` or `ChannelManager::create_refund_builder` may prevent downgrading to LDK prior to 0.0.118 until the payment times out and has been removed (lightningdevkit#2039). Node Compatibility ================== * LDK now sends a bogus `channel_reestablish` message to peers when they ask to resume an unknown channel. This should cause LND nodes to force-close and broadcast the latest channel state to the chain. In order to trigger this when we wish to force-close a channel, LDK now disconnects immediately after sending a channel-closing `error` message. This should result in cooperative peers also working to confirm the latest commitment transaction when we wish to force-close (lightningdevkit#2658). Security ======== 0.0.118 expands mitigations against transaction cycling attacks to non-anchor channels, though note that no mitigations which exist today are considered robust to prevent the class of attacks. * In order to mitigate against transaction cycling attacks, non-anchor HTLC transactions are now properly re-signed before broadcasting (lightningdevkit#2667). In total, this release features 61 files changed, 3470 insertions, 1503 deletions in 85 commits from 12 authors, in alphabetical order: * Antonio Yang * Elias Rohrer * Evan Feenstra * Fedeparma74 * Gursharan Singh * Jeffrey Czyz * Matt Corallo * Sergi Delgado Segura * Vladimir Fomene * Wilmer Paulino * benthecarman * slanesuke
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We want to ensure we use fresh random signatures to prevent certain classes of transaction replacement attacks at the bitcoin P2P layer. This was already covered for commitment transactions and zero fee holder HTLC transactions, but was missing for holder HTLC transactions on non-anchors channels due to a signature cache. This PR removed said cache completely and switches to signing holder HTLCs with the existing
sign_holder_htlc_transactionsigning method, previously only used for anchor channels.