Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Ah, we might actually need all the "# pylint: " directives for the google-internal fire codebase. Let's hold off on this. |
Contributor
Author
good to know, in such case would nee to keep pylint... :( |
Contributor
Author
|
@dbieber friendly ping if we shall land it or close it? :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
reaction to #549 (comment)
Switch from
pylintto Ruff with the same rules to be appliedthe Ruff is implemented as pre-commit hook for simplicity