chore: improve code comments clarity

[stringscut]

Overview

improve code comments clarity

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @stringscut, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on improving the clarity and grammatical correctness of existing code comments across several files. The changes are purely textual within comments and do not alter any functional logic, aiming to enhance code maintainability and understanding for future developers.

Highlights

• Grammatical Corrections: Corrected several grammatical errors in comments, such as changing 'headers was' to 'headers were' and 'components does' to 'component does', improving overall readability.
• Comment Clarification: Enhanced the clarity of a comment in da_retriever.go by adding 'since' to better explain why LastDataHash is nil.
• Typo Fixes: Addressed minor typos like 'an epochs' to 'an epoch' and 'timestamp correspond' to 'timestamp corresponds' in various comments.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request improves the clarity of code comments across several files by fixing minor grammatical errors. The changes are correct and successfully enhance readability. I have added one suggestion to further improve a comment's consistency and clarity.

[gemini-code-assist]

For consistency with the field name DAEpochForcedInclusion, the comment should use the same casing. Additionally, the phrasing could be made more direct for improved clarity.

Suggested change

	// DaEpochForcedInclusion corresponds to the amount of DA blocks are considered an epoch
	// DAEpochForcedInclusion defines the number of DA blocks that constitute an epoch

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.14%. Comparing base (afcd6bd) to head (6ce9a26).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.14%   60.14%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        8427     8427           
=======================================
  Hits         5068     5068           
  Misses       2787     2787           
  Partials      572      572           

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	60.14% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.