perf(pruner): batch header range extension in findPruneableHeaders #4749
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yyhrnk
requested review from
Wondertan,
renaynay,
vgonkivs and
walldiss
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change optimizes pruning by replacing multiple sequential GetByHeight calls with a single additional GetRangeByHeight when the initial estimated range does not fully cover the pruneable window. The new logic still respects maxHeadersPerLoop and the pruneCutoff time bound, but significantly reduces header store calls and slice growth work in scenarios where the node has accumulated a large backlog of pruneable headers (e.g. after being offline for a long time).