Redshift: Support implicit string concatenation using newline#2167
Merged
iffyio merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Jan 29, 2026
Merged
Redshift: Support implicit string concatenation using newline#2167iffyio merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
iffyio merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
yoavcloud
force-pushed
the
redshift_concat_strings_newline
branch
from
0062599 to
e05a766
Compare
ayman-sigma
pushed a commit
to sigmacomputing/sqlparser-rs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We've encountered a statement of the following form that failed to parse due to a missing comma, that is accepted by Redshift:
Turns out Redshift considers the
'a' <NEWLINE> 'b'as a concatenation, so it's evaluted as'ab'. The fix here is to parse this construct as'ab'.