Skip to content

cleanup: migration file rss_feed#1393

Closed
ankitsmt211 wants to merge 1 commit intoTogether-Java:developfrom
ankitsmt211:cleanup/rss-data
Closed

cleanup: migration file rss_feed#1393
ankitsmt211 wants to merge 1 commit intoTogether-Java:developfrom
ankitsmt211:cleanup/rss-data

Conversation

@ankitsmt211
Copy link
Member

database contains outdated data that's
no longer being used and has inconsistent
timestamps to avoid any complications in future

database contains outdated data that's
no longer being used and has inconsistent
timestamps
Copy link
Member

@Zabuzard Zabuzard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thats not a structural migration but a content migration. those should be executed outside of the migration system.

think about it this way: if TJ-Bot runs on some other server, maybe a C++-server, will this be relevant for their database? no, it wont. this is only relevant for our PROD DB. not even for our test-server DB and also not for our local users.

so for the above c++ server example, you would wipe their entire database table.

i would just run these queries on the server manually.

@ankitsmt211
Copy link
Member Author

thats not a structural migration but a content migration. those should be executed outside of the migration system.

think about it this way: if TJ-Bot runs on some other server, maybe a C++-server, will this be relevant for their database? no, it wont. this is only relevant for our PROD DB. not even for our test-server DB and also not for our local users.

so for the above c++ server example, you would wipe their entire database table.

i would just run these queries on the server manually.

Sure I'll run em on server then

@ankitsmt211 ankitsmt211 closed this Feb 3, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments