Closed
Conversation
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
5 times, most recently
from
787a78a to
d554b09
Compare
This was referenced Jun 25, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
converted to draft - It is running but there is still some work need to get it to a working state for all corner cases |
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
d554b09 to
763850b
Compare
This was referenced Jul 1, 2025
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
2 times, most recently
from
36730bf to
2aab143
Compare
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f068f39 to
7545971
Compare
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
7545971 to
90914d5
Compare
This was referenced Aug 12, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@adeas31 I'm not sure if the code in ModelicaSystemDoE will work well for bool or string parameters (= structural); I'm unsure how to correctly set these in OMC and how it will behave. Please advice! |
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
90914d5 to
e351fb6
Compare
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
e351fb6 to
08cf292
Compare
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
4781ac0 to
2c0f632
Compare
adeas31
approved these changes
Nov 3, 2025
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
5574d42 to
69a9be0
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebase done; see also #361 for an overview |
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
4e8b0b2 to
979c3b2
Compare
* no need to add aditional requirements * hint how to use pandas in the docstrings * update test to match code changes
* remove DICT_RESULT_FILENAME * add comment * add DICT_ID_STRUCTURE and DICT_ID_NON_STRUCTURE * rename param_simple => param_non_structure
* add ModelicaSystem.session() - returns _getconn * add ModelicaSystemDoE.session() - returns _mod.session() reasoning: * do not access private variables of a class * limit chain access to (sub)data
it does not exists at this point thus, resolve() and absolute() will fail
syntron
force-pushed
the
ModelicaSystemDoE
branch
from
24f2c19 to
d37f6ff
Compare
Member
|
I believe this can be closed now since #333 is merged. |
Contributor
Author
Correct! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New class to run DoEs based on the available functionality
Usage (see test_ModelicaSystemDoE):
based on PR #310, #311, #313, #314 and #316; see also #230