Requesting feedback on correct interpretation of docs on banlist

[Download]

jquery-complexify is currently behaving differently from the documentation in respect to loose and strict modes of working with the banlist. We are wondering whether the docs are wrong or the behavior. I'm hoping you will be able to give some feedback as to which is (should be) the correct interpretation.

The discussion is here:
danpalmer/jquery.complexify.js#31

[chickahoona]

Same problem (but easy fix possible)
Change:

            self.inBanlist = function(str) {
                for (var i = 0, c = options.bannedPasswords.length; i < c; i++) {
                    //line with problems incoming:
                    if (options.bannedPasswords[i].indexOf(str) !== -1) {
                        return true;
                    }
                }
                return false;
            };

to

            self.inBanlist = function(str) {
                for (var i = 0, c = options.bannedPasswords.length; i < c; i++) {
                    //fixed line incoming:
                    if (str.indexOf(options.bannedPasswords[i]) !== -1) {
                        return true;
                    }
                }
                return false;
            };

In addition you should update your blacklist, otherwise every password with a '0' drops to 0%, as 0 is on the blacklist ... (someone really hated 0 here :D )

[Download]

I've come to the conclusion that strict mode is unusable for me due to the current behavior.

[Kraku]

Repo is updated to the latest jQuery version. Strict mode is not perfect, I'll try to improve it soon.

[Download]

I have no gripes with angular-complexify, it's the implementation in complexify itself. Actually, the docs describe a very sensible solution, but the actual implementation is sort of 'greedy', matching way more than it should.