Skip to content

Conversation

@antonwolfy
Copy link
Contributor

@antonwolfy antonwolfy commented Apr 16, 2024

The PR proposes to remove use of -flink-huge-device-code link option, because it is no longer necessary and suspectedly makes linking of device code somewhat longer.
The option was previously introduced in scope of #1270.

  • Have you provided a meaningful PR description?
  • Have you added a test, reproducer or referred to issue with a reproducer?
  • Have you tested your changes locally for CPU and GPU devices?
  • Have you made sure that new changes do not introduce compiler warnings?
  • Have you checked performance impact of proposed changes?
  • If this PR is a work in progress, are you filing the PR as a draft?

@antonwolfy antonwolfy self-assigned this Apr 16, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 16, 2024

View rendered docs @ https://intelpython.github.io/dpnp/index.html

Copy link
Contributor

@vlad-perevezentsev vlad-perevezentsev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thank you @antonwolfy !

@antonwolfy antonwolfy merged commit bc81605 into master Apr 16, 2024
@antonwolfy antonwolfy deleted the get-rid-of-huge-device-code branch April 16, 2024 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants