[WIP] Add hashing changes for performance validation#3
Closed
[WIP] Add hashing changes for performance validation#3
Conversation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it and keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.
Original prompt
please take only Hashing changes (don't remove other changes for now, just don't commit them) and send a PR to dotnet/runtime. Use the benchmark skill to validate perf impact.
[Chronological Review] 1. Initial request: User asked to create a plan to find and fix trivially-replaceable unsafe code in dotnet/runtime Libraries and CoreLib 2. Phase 1 - Exploration: Launched multiple parallel explore agents to search for unsafe patterns (pointers, fixed, Unsafe.*, MemoryMarshal.*, Marshal.*) 3. Phase 2 - Verification: Launched additional agents to verify specific candidates, check build contexts, determine which polyfill files are netstandard2.0-only 4. Phase 3 - First plan: Created plan with 4 items including Enum.cs (Unsafe.As replacement) and Hashing.cs (MemoryMarshal.Cast) 5. Phase 4 - Plan rejected: User rejected because replacing unsafe with Unsafe.As/MemoryMarshal is NOT acceptable. User wants truly safe code only (Span, indexing, etc.) 6. Phase 5 - Re-search: Launched new agents to find truly safe replacements 7. Phase 6 - Updated plan: Created corrected plan with 4 truly safe changes (FixedBufferExtensions, WebHeaderEncoding, StringParser, Hashing) 8. Phase 7 - Plan approved, autopilot mode: Implemented all 4 changes 9. Phase 8 - Build & test: All builds passed, 24,819 tests passed across 4 test suites 10. Phase 9 - Code review: Performed code review, all changes approved 11. Phase 10 - User returned, asked if still working. Marked task complete. 12. Phase 11 - User had modified GetHashCodeOrdinal's default case to a simpler for-loop shape, asked me to do the same for GetHashCodeOrdinalIgnoreCaseAscii 13. Phase 12 - Updated IgnoreCase method to match. Built & tested (22,068 tests pass). 14. Phase 13 - User asked to save all changes EXCEPT Hashing.cs to a .diff patch file, keeping only Hashing.cs modified 15. Phase 14 - Created non-hashing-unsafe-cleanup.diff, reverted the 3 non-Hashing files. Only Hashing.cs remains modified.[Intent Mapping]
[Technical Inventory]
dotnet build <project>.csprojdotnet build /t:test <test-project>.csproj[Code Archaeology]
unsafe,fixed,MemoryMarshal.GetReference, replaced withspan.Slice(0, len).ToString()— REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixedpointer loops, replaced with Span indexing — REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixed(char* bufferPtr = _buffer), replaced with_buffer.AsSpan()indexing in 4 methods — REVERTED, saved to patchunsafe,fixed,MemoryMarshal.GetReference,(uint*)pointer casts. Replaced with span indexing + bit packing((uint)s[i] | ((uint)s[i+1] << 16)). User then modified GetHashCodeOrdinal default case to usefor (; i < s.Length - 3; i += 4)shape. I matched that shape in GetHashCodeOrdinalIgnoreCaseAscii. — STILL MODIFIED[Progress Assessment]
[Context Validation]
[Recent Commands Analysis]
git diffto create patch of 3 non-Hashing files → saved to .diff, thengit checkout --to revert those 3 files, thengit diff --statconfirming only Hashing.cs remains modified1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: User requested: "Please walk over the codebase and try to find places with unsafe code that you can trivially make safe." Specifically targeting: 1) unmanaged pointers/dereferencing/fixed statements, 2) Unsafe, MemoryMarshal, Marshal APIs. Rules: trivial changes only, ignore interop/pinvokes, focus on optimization-related unsafe code replaceable with Span, only Libraries and CoreLib (no tests/samples/tools/mono/nativeaot), no git commits. - Session Context: Explored do...
Created from Copilot CLI via the copilot delegate command.
📍 Connect Copilot coding agent with Jira, Azure Boards or Linear to delegate work to Copilot in one click without leaving your project management tool.