Skip to content

feat(wikibase-schema-editor): add qualifiers display#96

Merged
DaxServer merged 1 commit intomainfrom
wikibase-editor-task22
Jul 31, 2025
Merged

feat(wikibase-schema-editor): add qualifiers display#96
DaxServer merged 1 commit intomainfrom
wikibase-editor-task22

Conversation

@DaxServer
Copy link
Owner

Addresses Task 22 of #66

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Enhanced the visual presentation of qualifiers in both the statement editor and qualifier editor, including improved layout, color, and labeling for better readability and usability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved state management to ensure qualifiers are consistently initialized and handled during statement editing, reducing potential errors.
  • Documentation

    • Updated requirements and task documentation to clarify the display of qualifiers within their parent statements.
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive integration and logic tests for qualifier display and management in the statement editor, increasing reliability and coverage.

Walkthrough

This change refines the display semantics and user interface for qualifiers within the Wikibase Schema Editor. It updates requirements and tasks documentation, restructures and restyles the qualifier display in Vue components, adjusts local state management for statement editing, and introduces new integration and logic tests for qualifier handling.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Requirements & Tasks Documentation
.kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/requirements.md, .kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/tasks.md
Updated acceptance criteria and task descriptions to use "within" instead of "nested under" for qualifier display; marked qualifier display task as complete.
Qualifiers UI Enhancements
frontend/src/components/QualifiersEditor.vue, frontend/src/components/StatementEditor.vue
Restructured and restyled qualifiers and their preview sections with improved containers, headers, icons, and test IDs; enhanced visual hierarchy and clarity for qualifier display.
Statement Editing State Management
frontend/src/components/WikibaseSchemaEditor.vue
Changed local reactive state for current statement editing to always use a default-initialized object, ensuring consistent handling of qualifiers and avoiding null states.
StatementEditor Qualifier Integration Tests
frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts
Added new integration tests covering qualifier state management, preview logic, and update emission in the StatementEditor component.
StatementEditor Qualifier Display Logic Tests
frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts
Added new tests for qualifier display logic, state management, event handlers, and edge cases, focusing on business logic without DOM interaction.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant WikibaseSchemaEditor
    participant StatementEditor
    participant QualifiersEditor

    User->>WikibaseSchemaEditor: Add/Edit Statement
    WikibaseSchemaEditor->>StatementEditor: Pass currentStatementWithQualifiers
    StatementEditor->>QualifiersEditor: Pass qualifiers array
    User->>QualifiersEditor: Add/Remove/Edit Qualifier
    QualifiersEditor-->>StatementEditor: Emit updated qualifiers
    StatementEditor-->>WikibaseSchemaEditor: Emit updated statement with qualifiers
    WikibaseSchemaEditor-->>User: Update UI with new statement and qualifiers
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~18 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d95104b and 3124de3.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/requirements.md (1 hunks)
  • .kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/tasks.md (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/QualifiersEditor.vue (2 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/StatementEditor.vue (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/WikibaseSchemaEditor.vue (4 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc)

**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}: Use bun <file> instead of node <file> or ts-node <file> for running TypeScript or JavaScript files
Do not use dotenv; Bun automatically loads .env files
Use Bun.serve() for HTTP servers and WebSockets instead of express
Use bun:sqlite for SQLite instead of better-sqlite3
Use Bun.redis for Redis instead of ioredis
Use Bun.sql for Postgres instead of pg or postgres.js
Use built-in WebSocket instead of ws
Prefer Bun.file over node:fs's readFile/writeFile
Use Bun.$ (e.g., Bun.$ls``) instead of execa for running shell commands

Files:

  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts
  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts
**/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc)

Use bun test instead of jest for running tests

Files:

  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts
  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts
**/*.{html,ts,tsx,css}

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc)

Use bun build <file.html|file.ts|file.css> instead of webpack or esbuild for building HTML, TypeScript, or CSS files

Files:

  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts
  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts
🧠 Learnings (3)
📚 Learning: applies to src/**/*.vue : no inline style attributes in templates...
Learnt from: CR
PR: DaxServer/dataforge#0
File: .cursor/rules/frontend-setup.rule.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T14:13:24.706Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.vue : No inline style attributes in templates

Applied to files:

  • frontend/src/components/QualifiersEditor.vue
📚 Learning: applies to src/**/*.vue : use reactive objects for form state and errors...
Learnt from: CR
PR: DaxServer/dataforge#0
File: .cursor/rules/frontend-setup.rule.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T14:13:24.706Z
Learning: Applies to src/**/*.vue : Use reactive objects for form state and errors

Applied to files:

  • frontend/src/components/WikibaseSchemaEditor.vue
📚 Learning: applies to **/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : use `bun test` instead of `jest` for running tests...
Learnt from: CR
PR: DaxServer/dataforge#0
File: .cursor/rules/use-bun-instead-of-node-vite-npm-pnpm.mdc:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-20T14:13:40.153Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.test.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} : Use `bun test` instead of `jest` for running tests

Applied to files:

  • frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/tasks.md (1)

133-136: LGTM! Task completion aligns with PR objectives.

The task #22 has been appropriately updated from "Add qualifier nested display" to "Add qualifier display" and marked as complete. The subtask descriptions correctly reflect the semantic shift from "nested under parent statements" to "within their parent statement," which aligns with the updated requirements and implementation.

.kiro/specs/wikibase-schema-editor/requirements.md (1)

82-82: LGTM! Semantic refinement improves UI clarity.

The change from "nested under their parent statement" to "within their parent statement" is a thoughtful semantic refinement that better describes the integrated qualifier display approach implemented in the Vue components.

frontend/src/components/QualifiersEditor.vue (1)

200-295: Excellent UI enhancement with comprehensive test support.

The qualifier display has been significantly improved with:

  • Clear visual hierarchy using bordered containers and gradient backgrounds
  • Individual qualifier cards with hover effects and shadow transitions
  • Meaningful qualifier numbering (Q1, Q2, etc.) for better user orientation
  • Comprehensive data-testid attributes enabling thorough testing

The implementation follows the retrieved learning about avoiding inline styles and successfully implements the "within parent statement" display requirement.

frontend/src/components/StatementEditor.vue (1)

476-509: Consistent and well-executed preview enhancement.

The qualifiers preview section has been expertly enhanced with styling that matches the QualifiersEditor component:

  • Consistent bordered container with gradient background
  • Individual qualifier blocks with proper numbering (Q1, Q2, etc.)
  • Comprehensive test IDs for reliable testing
  • Visual hierarchy that clearly shows qualifiers within the statement context

The changes maintain existing logic while significantly improving the user experience and testability.

frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.qualifier-display.test.ts (1)

1-321: Comprehensive test suite with excellent coverage.

This test file provides thorough coverage of qualifier display functionality:

  • Display Logic: Tests qualifier preview visibility, formatting, and numbering
  • State Management: Verifies reactive state updates using Vue's ref
  • Event Handling: Covers add, remove, and update operations with edge cases
  • Edge Cases: Handles invalid indices, undefined props, and boundary conditions

The tests follow coding guidelines by using bun:test and focus appropriately on business logic rather than DOM testing. The structure complements integration tests and ensures reliable qualifier functionality.

frontend/src/components/WikibaseSchemaEditor.vue (5)

46-58: LGTM! Improved state consistency.

The change from nullable to always-initialized state eliminates potential null reference issues and provides a consistent default structure. The initialization with empty qualifiers array aligns well with the qualifier display requirements.


216-228: LGTM! Consistent reset logic.

The reset implementation correctly mirrors the initialization structure and ensures clean state when adding new statements.


236-242: LGTM! Proper defensive copying.

Excellent use of spread operators to create independent copies of the value object and qualifiers array. This prevents unintended mutations of the original statement data during editing.


317-329: LGTM! Consistent state cleanup.

The cancel handler properly resets state to the default initialized structure, maintaining consistency across all reset operations.


483-483: LGTM! Template binding aligned with state changes.

The model-value binding correctly uses the always-initialized currentStatementWithQualifiers, ensuring the StatementEditor component receives consistent data.

frontend/src/components/__tests__/StatementEditor.integration.test.ts (4)

18-106: LGTM! Comprehensive and realistic mocks.

The mock implementations provide realistic behavior that effectively isolates the component logic for testing. The useStatementEditor mock is particularly well-crafted with proper computed properties and state management.


118-273: LGTM! Thorough qualifier state management coverage.

The tests comprehensively cover qualifier initialization, CRUD operations, and state synchronization. Good handling of edge cases like empty and undefined states.


275-352: LGTM! Comprehensive preview logic testing.

The tests effectively verify both the visibility conditions for qualifier previews and the formatting logic for different value types. Good simulation of the component's computed properties.


354-400: LGTM! Proper integration testing of emit functionality.

The test correctly verifies that qualifiers are included in the emitted updates, ensuring proper data flow between the component and its parent.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch wikibase-editor-task22

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@DaxServer DaxServer merged commit 203399d into main Jul 31, 2025
6 checks passed
@DaxServer DaxServer deleted the wikibase-editor-task22 branch July 31, 2025 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant