Looking for Peer Reviews of my Commit Logs and Followers #182169
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
From the UI alone, this is clearly not a toy project. The system shows deliberate design around gamified learning (XP, levels, quests, categories, AI guide), and the layout is cohesive and consistent, which signals active iteration and real product intent rather than a static demo. That said, the progression mechanics need tightening. XP appears to be awarded purely on page visits (+10 XP shown on cards), and repeated visits likely re-trigger rewards. At scale, this undermines progression integrity and makes levels less meaningful. This should be gated behind a per-user completion state or capped/diminishing returns model. As the project matures, clearer content hierarchy and naming will improve usability and perceived polish. Overall: strong conceptual foundation and execution momentum, but the next step is hardening rules and reducing ambiguity especially around progression logic and content structure to move from prototype to production-grade system. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Consider checking out some of the outputs available at github.com/therickyfoster and github.com/ainfinalwarning
https://planetaryrestorationarchive.com
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions